Self-driving cars: liabilities shift to automakers when algos are driving - FT中文網
登錄×
電子郵件/用戶名
密碼
記住我
請輸入郵箱和密碼進行綁定操作:
請輸入手機號碼,透過簡訊驗證(目前僅支援中國大陸地區的手機號):
請您閱讀我們的用戶註冊協議私隱權保護政策,點擊下方按鈕即視爲您接受。
FT商學院

Self-driving cars: liabilities shift to automakers when algos are driving

Autonomous vehicle makers should expect to be punished for lives that are lost

Businesses developing self-driving cars talk up the technology’s potential to improve road safety. They had better be right — for financial as well as humane reasons. They will bear most of the liability for crashes. Automotive groups have a long history of product recalls and compensation payouts for the failures of far simpler systems.

Alphabet’s Waymo operates robotaxis in Arizona, Tesla works feverishly on “self-driving” modes and General Motors plans to deliver autonomous vehicles by mid-decade. The push has prompted the UK’s Law Commission to propose that users of self-driving cars should have immunity from a wide range of motoring offences, including dangerous driving.

Car manufacturers have been accountable for defective vehicles since a row in the US over Ford Pinto fuel tank fires in the 1970s. The industry spent billions of dollars last decade recalling vehicles affected by the exploding airbags made by Japan’s Takata.

Liabilities for self-driving cars are less clear-cut. Owners will sometimes have to take the wheel in an emergency or in heavy rain. German lawmakers consider they should then be legally responsible. The Law Commission believes such carve-outs are unworkable.

Under the proposals, vehicle manufacturers or software developers will need sufficient funds to organise recalls and pay fines. That might stifle the emergence of innovative start-ups.

Perhaps they could buy insurance? But self-driving cars would be a greater headache for Lloyd’s of London than other speciality lines. The risks in screeds of computer code are hard to assess. There are also cyber security issues. The International Underwriting Association of London raises the nightmare possibility of numerous accidents occurring simultaneously. That could pose a risk to insurers’ solvency, the IUA says.

None of this will deter developers. China’s Geely plans to have autonomous vehicles by 2024. Volkswagen expects self-driving cars to transform the industry. It recently earmarked €89bn for electric vehicle and software development.

Carmakers will end up provisioning for claims raised by ambulance-chasing lawyers too. Asymmetries in blame culture make them vulnerable. Human errors produce 90 per cent of road traffic crashes. Only self-driving accidents attract world media coverage. As Tesla boss Elon Musk recently acknowledged, autonomous vehicle makers may not be rewarded for the lives they save. They should, though, expect to be punished for those that are lost.

The Lex team is interested in hearing more from readers. Please tell us what you think of self-driving cars in the comments section below.

版權聲明:本文版權歸FT中文網所有,未經允許任何單位或個人不得轉載,複製或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵權必究。

和平協議的藝術

美國和俄羅斯之間的談判能否就烏克蘭問題達成持久的解決方案?歷史學家瑪格麗特•麥克米倫認爲,目前的跡象並不樂觀。

詹姆斯•邦德:屬於美國的英國間諜

伊恩•弗萊明的虛構作品,對英國情報機構來說既是福音又是負擔,如今將由科技巨擘亞馬遜來重新定義。

曼聯正在處理錯誤的問題

十年來積累的體育失敗如今正在衝擊俱樂部的盈虧底線。

政治學家比約恩•隆堡:『你不能在所有事情上都花錢』

這位「持懷疑態度的環保主義者」曾利用成本效益分析來反對減排。現在,他將注意力轉向了海外援助。

建立了一個隱祕全球房地產帝國的孟加拉政治家

賽福扎曼•喬杜裏和他的家人在海外購買了482處房產,花費了2.95億美元。新政府希望收回其中的一部分資金。

脫碳的自私指南

新的研究表明,即使美國對全球協議完全不感興趣,仍然會看到減少排放帶來的成本效益。
設置字型大小×
最小
較小
默認
較大
最大
分享×