Lego』s corporate model is key to its brick-by-brick success - FT中文網
登錄×
電子郵件/用戶名
密碼
記住我
請輸入郵箱和密碼進行綁定操作:
請輸入手機號碼,透過簡訊驗證(目前僅支援中國大陸地區的手機號):
請您閱讀我們的用戶註冊協議私隱權保護政策,點擊下方按鈕即視爲您接受。
FT商學院

Lego』s corporate model is key to its brick-by-brick success

The Danish company has benefitted from being built on a long-term perspective

Many one-product companies run out of road. Small plastic bricks have supported Denmark’s Lego for more than 70 years. A clear focus can pay off. But, amid a debate over the health of public markets, its success also demonstrates the benefits of its distinctive corporate structure.

The toymaker’s sales growth of 2 per cent last year was dragged down by a weak performance in China. But it was respectable enough given a seven per cent decline in toy industry sales. Lego’s sales are not much less than the combined total of its quoted US rivals Mattel and Hasbro. 

Inflation, one cause of the industry’s woes, is subsiding. Low birth rates, another problem, will persist. That is partly offset by adult fans of Lego. This group — known as Afols — creates a market for costly, complicated kits like the Titanic or Eiffel Tower. This “Icons” line made some of the biggest gains of any toy property globally in 2023, according to Circana. 

New products accounted for roughly half of Lego’s portfolio last year. Innovation isn’t without risk: novelty can damage profitability if it means fewer universal pieces that can be produced in high volumes for lots of different kits. The proliferation of parts contributed to Lego’s downturn in 2003, says academic David Robertson. However, the business has since expanded so it can use more parts without hurting the ratio of sales to profits.   

Lego’s operating profit margin fell by 1.7 per cent to 26 per cent, as it spent more on stores, its supply chain and digital operations. Even so, that is nearly three times Hasbro’s adjusted operating figure. Were it quoted, Lego would be worth much more than the $43bn estimate arrived at by using Hasbro’s trailing EV-to-ebitda ratio of 15.5 times.

But Lego is privately held and there is no sign of that changing. Kirkbi, an investment vehicle run by the founding family, owns 75 per cent, with the remainder owned by the Lego Foundation. When an heir opted to sell some Kirkbi shares for $930mn last year, family members took up the slack. Outside investors’ only exposure to the brand is through Legoland-owner Merlin Entertainments. Blackstone and Canadian pension fund CPPIB teamed up with Kirkbi on the £6bn take-private bid in 2019. 

External investors might have been less inclined to tolerate last year’s 10 per cent dividend cut to fund investment. There is evidence that tightly held companies like Lego benefit from a long-term perspective. Building the business, like its product, is an exercise in patience. It can yield impressive results.

vanessa.houlder@ft.com

版權聲明:本文版權歸FT中文網所有,未經允許任何單位或個人不得轉載,複製或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵權必究。

矽谷在川普支援下挑戰歐盟技術規則

Meta等美國團體有了川普撐腰,試圖讓有關人工智慧和市場支配地位的歐盟規定在執行時縮水。

歐洲如何在沒有美國幫助的情況下保衛自己

歐洲各國正爭相填補安全缺口,以防川普撤走美國駐歐軍事資產。

比亞迪的戰略轉變將衝擊全球汽車製造商

比亞迪將先進駕駛輔助系統作爲標準配置,不收取額外費用,這將會削弱競爭對手的實力。

Lex專欄:歐洲天然氣面臨似曾相識的局面

除非歐洲大陸修復其潛在的能源結構,否則很難完全消除俄羅斯進口天然氣的誘惑。

蘋果悄悄轉向印度

蘋果希望在中國以外實現供應鏈多元化,印度能抓住這個機會嗎?

「莫迪-川普」能源承諾爲美國天然氣出口商帶來紅利

莫迪和川普上週同意增加美國石油和天然氣出口,這是兩國貿易關係再平衡努力的一部分。
設置字型大小×
最小
較小
默認
較大
最大
分享×