DeepSeek changes rules of AI』s great game - FT中文網
登錄×
電子郵件/用戶名
密碼
記住我
請輸入郵箱和密碼進行綁定操作:
請輸入手機號碼,透過簡訊驗證(目前僅支援中國大陸地區的手機號):
請您閱讀我們的用戶註冊協議私隱權保護政策,點擊下方按鈕即視爲您接受。
FT商學院

DeepSeek changes rules of AI』s great game

Chinese start-up』s breakthrough may be bad news for US tech giants but could be a windfall for everyone else
00:00

It is hard to talk about 21st-century economic history without discussing the “China shock”. That is the term often used to describe China’s entrance into the global market, a change that brought rich countries an abundance of cheap goods, but left entire industries and workforces mothballed.

DeepSeek may provide a sequel. A little-known Chinese hedge fund has thrown a grenade into the world of artificial intelligence with a large language model that, in effect, matches the market leader, Sam Altman’s OpenAI, at a fraction of the cost. And while OpenAI treats its models’ workings as proprietary, DeepSeek’s R1 wears its technical innards on the outside, making it attractive for developers to use and build on.

Things move faster in the AI age; terrifyingly so. Five of the biggest technology stocks geared to AI — chipmaker Nvidia and so-called hyperscalers Alphabet, Amazon, Microsoft and Meta Platforms — collectively shed almost $750bn of market value before US markets opened on Monday. It could be particularly grim for Nvidia if it proves true that DeepSeek won without the use of its shiniest chips.

Investors in tech companies, including Europeans such as chipmaker ASML, and energy companies that investors hoped would get a boost from fuelling data centres, are left wondering whether their investments will go up in smoke. The hyperscalers were due to plough almost $300bn into capital expenditure this year, according to Visible Alpha estimates. Analysts expect that on Wednesday, when they report earnings, Meta and Microsoft will report investment for 2024 totalling $94bn.

In truth, the game is not over. DeepSeek’s actual potential is still unclear, and it has yet to achieve “artificial general intelligence”, the humanlike state that Meta and OpenAI are pursuing. But the rules might have changed. At the very least, DeepSeek may take some of the US giants’ customers. At worst, it has challenged the core belief that more hardware is the key to better AI. That principle has underpinned the market value of Silicon Valley companies as they invest hand over fist.

What is bad for the hyperscalers could still be a windfall for everyone else. For most business users, having the absolute best model is less important than having one that’s reliable and good enough. Not every driver needs a Ferrari. Advances in reasoning such as R1 could be a big step for “agents” that deal with customers and perform tasks in the workplace. If those are available more cheaply, corporate profitability should rise.

In that sense, this second China shock could resemble the first. It could bring not just destruction but a reshuffling — albeit a painful one for many. Researchers have estimated that for every job lost to the China shock, US households’ purchasing power rose by more than $400,000. The race for AI supremacy is on pause; the great giveaway has begun.

版權聲明:本文版權歸FT中文網所有,未經允許任何單位或個人不得轉載,複製或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵權必究。

Accel的哈里•尼利斯:『許多企業家意識到歐洲是創業的好地方』

這位風險投資集團的長期合夥人回顧了歐洲新創企業的發展歷程,並探討了人工智慧的蓬勃發展。

巴拿馬一座閒置銅礦對綠色轉型的啓示

就在巴拿馬與川普圍繞巴拿馬運河的威脅展開鬥爭之際,該國最大采礦項目的未來再次引發了一場激烈的環境爭端。

對川普最愛的詞的另一種解讀

換個角度看,美國總統還會選擇關稅嗎?

中國市場的第二春

深度求索帶來的科技反彈與馬雲的迴歸。

空中旅行是否變得更加危險?

一連串備受矚目的事故讓人們對航空安全有了新的認識。

一週新聞小測:2025年2月22日

您對本週的全球重大新聞了解如何?來做個小測試吧!
設置字型大小×
最小
較小
默認
較大
最大
分享×