Goldman Sachs: market leader』s cyclicality makes it market laggard | 引領者高盛集團因市場週期性落後? - FT中文網
登錄×
電子郵件/用戶名
密碼
記住我
請輸入郵箱和密碼進行綁定操作:
請輸入手機號碼,透過簡訊驗證(目前僅支援中國大陸地區的手機號):
請您閱讀我們的用戶註冊協議私隱權保護政策,點擊下方按鈕即視爲您接受。
FT英語電臺

Goldman Sachs: market leader』s cyclicality makes it market laggard
引領者高盛集團因市場週期性落後?

Bank』s core business remains inexorably tied to market cycles
00:00

Tuesday was not the celebration that David Solomon was hoping for. Analysts wished the Goldman Sachs chief executive happy birthday on the bank’s earnings call. There was little to celebrate after that.

A deal dearth and Goldman’s disappointing foray into consumer banking could be distilled into a single figure: a measly 4.4 per cent annualised return on equity in the fourth quarter. That smacked of the tough times it was going through before the pandemic-related surge in trading and dealmaking.

Even Solomon, 61, was forced to concede the performance of the US investment bank was “disappointing”. On the same day, arch-rival Morgan Stanley reported that 2022 wealth management revenues hit nearly $25bn. Its return on equity of 9.2 per cent added to Goldman’s anguish.

Goldman’s franchise remains towering, but its core business remains inexorably tied to market cycles. That left the birthday boy simply hoping that sharp cost cuts and a “soft landing” for the economy would spark an eventual turnround.

In the first quarter of 2021, Goldman’s ROE hit a remarkable 31 per cent, a level more associated with its highly leveraged pre-2008 financial crisis days. As Solomon tried to explain, both 2021 and 2022 were polar opposites. In the opening quarter of 2021, Goldman generated $7bn of profits. For all of 2022, the firm mustered just $11bn.

The $3bn in losses that Goldman disclosed last week largely tied to investments in consumer finance can no longer be obscured by Goldman’s strength in institutional securities.

Goldman said the axing last week of 6 per cent of its workforce came after boosting headcount by a tenth in the previous period. On Tuesday, Solomon admitted that the company had been overconfident in its expectations for new businesses. Goldman is left hoping it can extract stable earnings from asset management fees as well as wringing more from corporate clients for new products.

Solomon noted that even amid all the flux, Goldman had still been able to grow book value steadily in recent years. After falling nearly 10 per cent on Tuesday its stock price is down nearly a fifth from its 2021 peak and trades at a price to book value ratio of 1.1 times.

A lot can happen in a year. Solomon will hope that the worst is over for Goldman by the time he is 62. If not, the world’s most famous investment bank may be back in the doldrums for good.

undefined

版權聲明:本文版權歸FT中文網所有,未經允許任何單位或個人不得轉載,複製或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵權必究。

財富大轉移

鉅額遺產將改變經濟、市場和社會。

物種復活時代:我們應該把猛獁象帶回來嗎?

物種復活即將成爲現實,這也可能分散我們拯救瀕臨滅絕的動物的注意力。

以色列的「恐怖呼機行動」如何震動全球間諜首腦

很少有西方情報官員表示他們會批准類似以色列尋呼機襲擊的行動。

2025年值得期待的電影:怪異遊戲與哥特式恐怖

從妮可•基德曼的情色驚悚片到一級方程式賽車史詩,以及兩個弗蘭肯斯坦的改編版本。

現代生活淹沒在冗長言辭的海洋中

從公司的「文字沙拉」到冗長的簡報,簡潔明瞭的文字已讓位於大量的文字。

投資者押注的零和遊戲

在全球經濟陷入低成長的情況下,利潤率不可能永遠上升,政治風險可能會增加。
設置字型大小×
最小
較小
默認
較大
最大
分享×