Goldman Sachs: market leader』s cyclicality makes it market laggard | 引領者高盛集團因市場週期性落後? - FT中文網
登錄×
電子郵件/用戶名
密碼
記住我
請輸入郵箱和密碼進行綁定操作:
請輸入手機號碼,透過簡訊驗證(目前僅支援中國大陸地區的手機號):
請您閱讀我們的用戶註冊協議私隱權保護政策,點擊下方按鈕即視爲您接受。
FT英語電臺

Goldman Sachs: market leader』s cyclicality makes it market laggard
引領者高盛集團因市場週期性落後?

Bank』s core business remains inexorably tied to market cycles
00:00

Tuesday was not the celebration that David Solomon was hoping for. Analysts wished the Goldman Sachs chief executive happy birthday on the bank’s earnings call. There was little to celebrate after that.

A deal dearth and Goldman’s disappointing foray into consumer banking could be distilled into a single figure: a measly 4.4 per cent annualised return on equity in the fourth quarter. That smacked of the tough times it was going through before the pandemic-related surge in trading and dealmaking.

Even Solomon, 61, was forced to concede the performance of the US investment bank was “disappointing”. On the same day, arch-rival Morgan Stanley reported that 2022 wealth management revenues hit nearly $25bn. Its return on equity of 9.2 per cent added to Goldman’s anguish.

Goldman’s franchise remains towering, but its core business remains inexorably tied to market cycles. That left the birthday boy simply hoping that sharp cost cuts and a “soft landing” for the economy would spark an eventual turnround.

In the first quarter of 2021, Goldman’s ROE hit a remarkable 31 per cent, a level more associated with its highly leveraged pre-2008 financial crisis days. As Solomon tried to explain, both 2021 and 2022 were polar opposites. In the opening quarter of 2021, Goldman generated $7bn of profits. For all of 2022, the firm mustered just $11bn.

The $3bn in losses that Goldman disclosed last week largely tied to investments in consumer finance can no longer be obscured by Goldman’s strength in institutional securities.

Goldman said the axing last week of 6 per cent of its workforce came after boosting headcount by a tenth in the previous period. On Tuesday, Solomon admitted that the company had been overconfident in its expectations for new businesses. Goldman is left hoping it can extract stable earnings from asset management fees as well as wringing more from corporate clients for new products.

Solomon noted that even amid all the flux, Goldman had still been able to grow book value steadily in recent years. After falling nearly 10 per cent on Tuesday its stock price is down nearly a fifth from its 2021 peak and trades at a price to book value ratio of 1.1 times.

A lot can happen in a year. Solomon will hope that the worst is over for Goldman by the time he is 62. If not, the world’s most famous investment bank may be back in the doldrums for good.

undefined

版權聲明:本文版權歸FT中文網所有,未經允許任何單位或個人不得轉載,複製或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵權必究。

Thrive Capital:多樣化是給那些不知道自己在做什麼的人準備的

喬什•庫許納旗下的這家年輕的創投公司以大手筆投資OpenAI而聞名,顛覆了傳統的風險投資模式。它能得到真正的收益嗎?

誰要買Chrome?

關於儲蓄的思考。

將谷歌和Chrome瀏覽器分開是好辦法嗎?

呼籲這家搜尋巨擘剝離Chrome瀏覽器,會給用戶帶來他們顯然不想要的東西。

高成長並不能說明美國經濟的全貌

令人印象深刻的頭條數字對民主黨沒有幫助。

沒有學位也沒問題:美國僱主不再侷限於大學文憑

IBM、通用汽車和沃爾瑪等公司正專注於申請人的技能,而不是教育。

阿達尼醜聞將動搖印度股市替代中國的努力

就在幾個月前,印度股票被視爲全球投資者投資組合中中國股票的可行替代,但此次事件使人們重新關注當地股票的風險和高昂估值。
設置字型大小×
最小
較小
默認
較大
最大
分享×