M&G: new chief may yield value at lower risk than a break-up - FT中文網
登錄×
電子郵件/用戶名
密碼
記住我
請輸入郵箱和密碼進行綁定操作:
請輸入手機號碼,透過簡訊驗證(目前僅支援中國大陸地區的手機號):
請您閱讀我們的用戶註冊協議私隱權保護政策,點擊下方按鈕即視爲您接受。
FT商學院

M&G: new chief may yield value at lower risk than a break-up

Investors should wait for results of leadership change before pursuing a further demerger
00:00

M&G’s fund managers have supported numerous corporate demergers in the name of unlocking shareholder value. Indeed, the same logic was part of M&G’s separation from Asia-focused insurer and savings group Prudential at the end of 2019.

That move popped the joint valuation for a while. After this, Pru slipped on China worries and M&G moved sideways. Some investors are now mooting a further break-up of the UK savings and investments group.

Schroders mulled a bid for M&G at the beginning of last year. It would have hung on to asset management while disposing of the life and pension businesses. The deal foundered over concerns about a culture clash and slumping investment flows.

These turned positive in the first half of this year for the first time since the demerger. A higher price for the group’s most valuable division should be warranted.

At £5.6bn, M&G’s market value is just a hair below its listing value. A group valuation multiple of 10 times forward earnings is well below 14 times for Schroders. M&G’s lower rating reflects slower growth and its reliance on unfashionable savings and pension products.

These include a large back book of annuities and with-profit insurance policies, along with the flagship PruFund, which remains open to new business.

The with-profits businesses might be worth 20 per cent of own funds, or £3bn. Other insurance businesses could attract £4.5bn, including net debt, equating to 76 per cent of own funds, think analysts at RBC. Add in £2.4bn for the asset management business on a 14 times multiple and any savings a consolidator might find. That implies 40 per cent upside from a break-up over the current price.

However, a deal would have to be all or nothing. A partial sale of the back book, for example, would scupper a dividend currently yielding over 8 per cent. Meanwhile, M&G is tipped to benefit from Solvency II reforms. Its shares have outperformed peers by nearly 40 per cent this year.

Investors should wait and see whether a new chief executive can squeeze more value from M&G with lower risk than a break-up.

版權聲明:本文版權歸FT中文網所有,未經允許任何單位或個人不得轉載,複製或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵權必究。

如何理解伊隆•馬斯克

他對政府的攻擊在意識形態上並不連貫,但可以追溯到一種重視激進思想的工程思維方式。

誰來保衛歐洲?

夾在咄咄逼人的俄羅斯和脫離接觸的美國之間,非洲大陸的西方民主國家現在必須重新武裝,否則將付出代價。

點石成金:4000年來對黃金的誤解

貴金屬的價格最近創下歷史新高。但囤積真的是通往人類幸福的途徑嗎?

斯塔默在AI安全問題上緊隨川普立場

英國政府改變人工智慧監管戰略,希望與美國新政府建立更好的關係。

一週新聞小測:2025年2月15日

您對本週的全球重大新聞了解如何?來做個小測試吧!

美國企業界是否已對川普感到不滿?

對減稅和放鬆監管前景的樂觀情緒已經讓位於對貿易政策的焦慮。
設置字型大小×
最小
較小
默認
較大
最大
分享×