The great green business rethink is finally happening - FT中文網
登錄×
電子郵件/用戶名
密碼
記住我
請輸入郵箱和密碼進行綁定操作:
請輸入手機號碼,透過簡訊驗證(目前僅支援中國大陸地區的手機號):
請您閱讀我們的用戶註冊協議私隱權保護政策,點擊下方按鈕即視爲您接受。
觀點 氣候變化

The great green business rethink is finally happening

An overdue push to reshape markets, not just individual companies, is under way at last
00:00

Is corporate sustainability as we know it finally over? Are traditional green business strategies failing to the point that they are doing more harm than good?

Perhaps not entirely. But the growing number of sustainable business leaders calling for a rethink of these measures suggests a tipping point is at hand.

For those of us who have never thought it likely that businesses and the markets that shape them would be enough to fix the gathering menace of climate change, this realisation is overdue.

But it’s not trivial. There may not be enough time to upend capitalism but there is plenty of time for companies to push for markets to be reformed in ways that drive faster climate action.

So it has been a relief to see a rising recognition that the status quo is not working.

Or as Lindsay Hooper and Paul Gilding from the venerable Cambridge Institute for Sustainability Leadership put it in a paper this month, “it is time we questioned the founding ideas and dominant approaches in the corporate sustainability movement”.

The Cambridge university-based institute is a prominent voice in corporate greenery, thanks in part to the backing it has had for most of its 36-year history from its royal conservationist patron, King Charles III.

But as Hooper and Gilding point out, despite years of green corporate pledges, and mushrooming clean tech investments, “the sustainability crisis is deepening”.

Worse, businesses and their sustainability advisers may be adding to the problem by giving a false impression of progress that is delaying “required radical changes to markets and the policies that frame them”.

The pair say companies should go beyond setting targets for cutting their own carbon footprints and start lobbying for sweeping, long-term rules that reshape entire markets.

For a start, this approach should lower the competitive risks that green business pioneers often face.

Another big advantage has been laid bare this year by the slew of green corporate U-turns, from Shell’s weakening of climate targets to Volvo’s delayed deadline for selling only fully electric cars.

Such backtracking underlines the fact that sustainability measures are still often seen as discretionary moves, taken by personally committed leaders and easily undone when times are tough.

As another sustainability veteran, John Elkington, wrote last month: “We must become less dependent on the goodwill and good citizenship of individual business leaders, both of which can be fragile foundations for sustained commitment. ”

Elkington knows of what he speaks. He coined corporate sustainability ideas such as “triple bottom line” reporting to measure social and environmental, as well as financial, performance. But as he wrote last month, sustainability can no longer be only about transforming businesses. “Increasingly, too, it must be about transforming markets. ”

A more strident case for the perils of relying on green-minded leaders has come from Jonathon Porritt, a sustainability campaigner who has spent years advising large companies, including Unilever.

The consumer goods giant has dismayed green activists by rolling back targets on measures such as plastic use and recycling following last year’s appointment of a new CEO, Hein Schumacher.

His approach marks a sharp break with that of former Unilever bosses like Paul Polman, who memorably told investors who didn’t approve of his sustainability efforts “don’t put your money in our company”.

For Porritt, “Unilever’s fall from grace reveals the deep flaws in that whole concept of corporate sustainability as a primary driver of more sustainable ways of creating and distributing wealth. ”

So will much change? Maybe. Talk of the need for greater regulation was in the air at last week’s New York Climate Week, as it would be.

Jes Munk Hansen, chief executive of the Danish insulation maker, Rockwool, told one event that regulators could slash the sizeable carbon emissions from buildings by setting tougher standards.

Government rules had helped to drive the shift away from incandescent light bulbs to more energy efficient lights, said Hansen, a former executive at the Osram lighting group.

As he told me later, “It would help the green transition greatly if building regulators used more tools such as higher energy efficiency standards. ”

He is right. Regulators and governments could do more and some firms are pushing them to do so. But these companies are still in a minority. A lot more must join them if corporate sustainability is ever going to create a more sustainable world.

Climate Capital

Where climate change meets business, markets and politics. Explore the FT’s coverage here.

Are you curious about the FT’s environmental sustainability commitments? Find out more about our science-based targets here

版權聲明:本文版權歸FT中文網所有,未經允許任何單位或個人不得轉載,複製或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵權必究。

如何理解伊隆•馬斯克

他對政府的攻擊在意識形態上並不連貫,但可以追溯到一種重視激進思想的工程思維方式。

誰來保衛歐洲?

夾在咄咄逼人的俄羅斯和脫離接觸的美國之間,非洲大陸的西方民主國家現在必須重新武裝,否則將付出代價。

點石成金:4000年來對黃金的誤解

貴金屬的價格最近創下歷史新高。但囤積真的是通往人類幸福的途徑嗎?

斯塔默在AI安全問題上緊隨川普立場

英國政府改變人工智慧監管戰略,希望與美國新政府建立更好的關係。

一週新聞小測:2025年2月15日

您對本週的全球重大新聞了解如何?來做個小測試吧!

美國企業界是否已對川普感到不滿?

對減稅和放鬆監管前景的樂觀情緒已經讓位於對貿易政策的焦慮。
設置字型大小×
最小
較小
默認
較大
最大
分享×