Cloud busting: the disruptive potential impact of AI on computing platforms - FT中文網
登錄×
電子郵件/用戶名
密碼
記住我
請輸入郵箱和密碼進行綁定操作:
請輸入手機號碼,透過簡訊驗證(目前僅支援中國大陸地區的手機號):
請您閱讀我們的用戶註冊協議私隱權保護政策,點擊下方按鈕即視爲您接受。
FT商學院

Cloud busting: the disruptive potential impact of AI on computing platforms

Industry sees a rebound but new technology will change competitive dynamics in the long term
00:00

A generalised euphoria over generative artificial intelligence has gripped Wall Street. But the technology had little to do with the strong business performance reported by most of the big US tech companies in recent days.

Understanding where the technology is starting to yield real business results — and where it isn’t — will be key to distinguishing the AI winners from the AI losers in the coming months and years.

Consider, for example, the business rebound that the biggest cloud computing platforms have experienced this year. Last week, reaccelerating growth in the cloud computing divisions at Microsoft and Google fed hopes that AI was starting to make a noticeable impact. This week, Amazon Web Services, the cloud market leader, has added to the upbeat mood.

The recent results provide little insight, though, into how much this growth rebound reflects a pick-up in spending on generative AI, how sustainable any such spending will prove to be, and how expensive it will be to deliver the new AI services.

The last two years brought a drastic fall-off in cloud growth. Many customers who had seen their cloud bills soar during the pandemic put a brake on new spending as they tried to work out how to get more bang for the buck.

This pause, referred to euphemistically by the tech companies as a period of “optimisation”, laid waste to one of the industry’s biggest drivers of expansion. Revenue growth at AWS tumbled from 40 per cent at the end of 2021 to a relative trough of 12 per cent 18 months later.

That it has now rebounded to 17 per cent in the latest quarter is a sign that the indigestion caused by the earlier binge of cloud spending is largely a thing of the past. According to Andy Jassy, Amazon’s chief executive (and former head of the cloud division), this is a return to the status quo ante, when the move to the cloud was fuelled by a desire to drive down IT costs. With only 15 per cent of corporate IT workload in the cloud, he argues this trend has a long way to run.

AI is not the main force here — though, at the margin, it is certainly becoming a factor. Most clearly, Microsoft’s annualised revenue from generative AI is now generally put at about $4bn, while Jassy also said it has become a “multibillion-dollar” business for AWS.

It is unclear how quickly these AI revenues will grow, or how big the market will be. There has been a stampede by customers to train new AI models and to try out the new services these make possible. But until this period of mass experimentation passes, it is hard to predict how much value the new technology will create — or how much customers will be willing to pay for it.

While the timing of the pay-off is uncertain, the costs are very real. Alphabet, Amazon and Microsoft are on course for combined capital spending of more than $150bn in their current financial years, more than $40bn above what they spent the year before. These are massive downpayments on the promise of a coming tech boom.

Cutting depreciation charges by extending the expected useful lives of all this new data centre gear has taken some of the edge off this vast build-up in investment at all three companies. Alphabet, for instance, boosted its operating profits by nearly $4bn last year after it increased the expected life of its servers and networking gear to six years, spreading the cost of buying new equipment over a longer period.

Another factor offsetting some of the pain is the cloud companies’ claim to be able to tie their investments closely to expected near-term revenue from customers who are lining up to try out the new technology. That helps to explain why Wall Street has taken the latest investment increases from the cloud companies in its stride.

A further unknown is whether the generative AI wave will be disruptive enough to upset the balance of power in the cloud industry, which has looked remarkably stable in recent years. At an annualised $100bn, AWS’s revenue is probably twice that of Microsoft’s Azure cloud platform. Google is further behind.

Customers are understandably conservative about shifting their vital data and IT workloads between clouds, and AWS has been racing to build out its AI capabilities. But Microsoft’s early lead, thanks to its partnership with OpenAI, is a big factor behind Azure’s current growth rate of 31 per cent, nearly double the 17 per cent of AWS.

This will be a long race, with every chance of resetting the competitive dynamics between the tech giants.

版權聲明:本文版權歸FT中文網所有,未經允許任何單位或個人不得轉載,複製或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵權必究。

川普的貿易「解放日」是什麼?

美國總統將4月2日定爲全面升級關稅政策的時刻。

「這不是父母的錯」:數字權利活動家比班•基德龍

這位從電影導演轉爲無黨派上議院議員的人士談論了與大型科技公司鬥爭以保護兒童的經歷,以及失聲如何讓她對權力有了新的見解。

使利比亞持續分裂的非法石油貿易

高額補貼的燃料被走私出境,銷往國外,幫助維持對立政治派別的生存。

暴雨將至:我們爲何忽視地表水氾濫風險的上升?

新的模型顯示,英國有460萬處房產面臨降雨量超過地面吸收能力的風險,比一年前增加了43%。保險公司正在撤退,但很少有房主願意接受他們的脆弱性。

哥倫比亞大學校長在屈從川普要求後辭職

卡特里娜•阿姆斯特朗在該機構同意一系列改革以避免資金削減一週後離職。

主動型ETF:歐洲陷入困境的資產管理公司的救命稻草?

成長迅速,但起點較低,而且美國的大型競爭對手已經佔據了市場主導地位。
設置字型大小×
最小
較小
默認
較大
最大
分享×