EU』s oil ban: if market friction is low, so is the pain for Russia - FT中文網
登錄×
電子郵件/用戶名
密碼
記住我
請輸入郵箱和密碼進行綁定操作:
請輸入手機號碼,透過簡訊驗證(目前僅支援中國大陸地區的手機號):
請您閱讀我們的用戶註冊協議私隱權保護政策,點擊下方按鈕即視爲您接受。
FT商學院

EU』s oil ban: if market friction is low, so is the pain for Russia

The bloc』s agreed partial embargo may prove to be ineffective as higher prices could compensate for reduced volumes

The aim of economic warfare is to inflict maximum pain at minimum cost. Achieving that is hard when the target is a key commodity producer. The EU’s agreement to ban most Russian oil imports reflects justified outrage at the barbaric invasion of Ukraine. But it may prove to be ineffective.

The problem with oil is that it is traded internationally. Higher prices may compensate Russia for reduced volumes, as US Treasury secretary Janet Yellen argued in April. Equally, customers in the EU and outside it may swap sources of supply in response to price signals, with little ultimate impact on the Russian exchequer.

The lower the level of substitution, the more powerful the partial embargo. Some countries, for example, lack refineries that can process Urals, Russia’s sulphurous main export blend.

That is not a problem for China and India. They have already moved to fill the gap in demand for Russian oil created by self-sanctioning by European refiners and traders. India rarely bought Russian oil in the past. But it emerged as the largest purchaser of Russian Urals crude in April, according to S&P Global.

Asian countries may not take up the full slack in demand for Russian oil, however, fearing retaliatory western sanctions. Capital Economics thinks Russia’s oil exports will fall by a fifth this year, even allowing for a 15 per cent rise in exports to non-western countries. But after factoring in higher prices, the consultancy estimates that Russia’s oil export revenues will be $180bn, a mere $2bn lower than in 2021.

The gap between Brent and Urals crude — currently $31 — may eventually fall in response to substitution. One response from the west may be to ban its insurers from covering tankers carrying Russian oil. Creating friction of a logistical kind is one way of compensating for a lack of it in markets.

Even after the oil embargo is fully phased in next year, it may be more than offset by higher gas prices. The oil embargo reduces Europe’s financial complicity. It will not, by itself, sabotage the Russian war machine.

版權聲明:本文版權歸FT中文網所有,未經允許任何單位或個人不得轉載,複製或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵權必究。

中國的「AI一體機」產品威脅到大型科技公司的雲成長戰略

華爲引領趨勢,爲企業提供支援其自身人工智慧程式的手段,而不是透過公共雲來實現。

伊朗如何悄悄地操縱下一任最高領袖的競選

該政權的權力掮客們爲了確保權力的平穩過渡已經盡了一切努力,只是沒有找到一個領跑者。

律師事務所探尋利用AI贏得先機的最佳方法

亞太地區的法律創新者正在競相展示他們將如何適應最新技術。

更多資本不是解決問題的辦法

耶魯大學史蒂文•凱利的訪談。

圍繞假科學的戰爭已經打響

在學術出版領域,人工智慧、欺詐探測器和作者經紀人之間展開了一場軍備競賽。

GPS戰爭是如何破壞平民生活的

軍事活動被認爲是影響智慧型手機、飛機和船隻的干擾和欺騙事件激增的原因。
設置字型大小×
最小
較小
默認
較大
最大
分享×