Lego』s corporate model is key to its brick-by-brick success - FT中文網
登錄×
電子郵件/用戶名
密碼
記住我
請輸入郵箱和密碼進行綁定操作:
請輸入手機號碼,透過簡訊驗證(目前僅支援中國大陸地區的手機號):
請您閱讀我們的用戶註冊協議私隱權保護政策,點擊下方按鈕即視爲您接受。
FT商學院

Lego』s corporate model is key to its brick-by-brick success

The Danish company has benefitted from being built on a long-term perspective

Many one-product companies run out of road. Small plastic bricks have supported Denmark’s Lego for more than 70 years. A clear focus can pay off. But, amid a debate over the health of public markets, its success also demonstrates the benefits of its distinctive corporate structure.

The toymaker’s sales growth of 2 per cent last year was dragged down by a weak performance in China. But it was respectable enough given a seven per cent decline in toy industry sales. Lego’s sales are not much less than the combined total of its quoted US rivals Mattel and Hasbro. 

Inflation, one cause of the industry’s woes, is subsiding. Low birth rates, another problem, will persist. That is partly offset by adult fans of Lego. This group — known as Afols — creates a market for costly, complicated kits like the Titanic or Eiffel Tower. This “Icons” line made some of the biggest gains of any toy property globally in 2023, according to Circana. 

New products accounted for roughly half of Lego’s portfolio last year. Innovation isn’t without risk: novelty can damage profitability if it means fewer universal pieces that can be produced in high volumes for lots of different kits. The proliferation of parts contributed to Lego’s downturn in 2003, says academic David Robertson. However, the business has since expanded so it can use more parts without hurting the ratio of sales to profits.   

Lego’s operating profit margin fell by 1.7 per cent to 26 per cent, as it spent more on stores, its supply chain and digital operations. Even so, that is nearly three times Hasbro’s adjusted operating figure. Were it quoted, Lego would be worth much more than the $43bn estimate arrived at by using Hasbro’s trailing EV-to-ebitda ratio of 15.5 times.

But Lego is privately held and there is no sign of that changing. Kirkbi, an investment vehicle run by the founding family, owns 75 per cent, with the remainder owned by the Lego Foundation. When an heir opted to sell some Kirkbi shares for $930mn last year, family members took up the slack. Outside investors’ only exposure to the brand is through Legoland-owner Merlin Entertainments. Blackstone and Canadian pension fund CPPIB teamed up with Kirkbi on the £6bn take-private bid in 2019. 

External investors might have been less inclined to tolerate last year’s 10 per cent dividend cut to fund investment. There is evidence that tightly held companies like Lego benefit from a long-term perspective. Building the business, like its product, is an exercise in patience. It can yield impressive results.

vanessa.houlder@ft.com

版權聲明:本文版權歸FT中文網所有,未經允許任何單位或個人不得轉載,複製或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵權必究。

儘管西方保護主義抬頭,中國電動汽車行業仍在開拓海外市場

吉利旗下的電動汽車製造商極氪上市首日股價上漲34%,成爲三年多來中國企業在美國進行的最大IPO。

即將從8000米高峯一躍而下的人

蒂姆•豪威爾不僅準備攀登世界上最高的山峯之一,還準備從山上跳下,創造翼裝運動的歷史。

如何尋找有趣的談話?

從一個依靠它獲得靈感的人那裏,我瞭解到如何找到它。

AI是否將摧毀新聞業最後的生存空間?

對於人工智慧是否能在短期內爲大型科技公司以外的任何人帶來好處,我持懷疑態度 。

對科技巨擘的監管打擊蔓延至亞洲和澳洲

東京、首爾和堪培拉追隨歐盟和美國,試圖遏制蘋果和谷歌的主導地位。

AI設備競賽的贏家可能已經在你的口袋裏了

科技巨擘和新創企業的新產品難以與智慧型手機競爭。
設置字型大小×
最小
較小
默認
較大
最大
分享×