Golden shares: a tarnished solution that smacks of protectionism - FT中文網
登錄×
電子郵件/用戶名
密碼
記住我
請輸入郵箱和密碼進行綁定操作:
請輸入手機號碼,透過簡訊驗證(目前僅支援中國大陸地區的手機號):
請您閱讀我們的用戶註冊協議私隱權保護政策,點擊下方按鈕即視爲您接受。
FT商學院

Golden shares: a tarnished solution that smacks of protectionism

State shares take a toll in terms of performance and free markets

State-held shares are back on the agenda. Popular during Europe’s wave of privatisation in the 1970s and 80s, so called golden shares — spezialaktie in Germany — allowed governments to wield control over a slew of public companies including utilities and oil and gas majors. By far the bulk had been redeemed by the turn of the millennium.

With globalisation in retreat and protectionism firmly re-ensconced, British politicians are hoping to spark a revival. The defence committee wants them reinstated across defence companies, irked at US private equity owned Cobham’s $3.6bn bid for Ultra Electronics. More speciously, MP Tom Tugendhat is angling for a government share — and a 25.1 per cent stake — in Arm, the chip designer, which owner SoftBank plans to list in New York after its planned $40bn sale to Nvidia collapsed. Echoing Washington and Beijing, he argues that national security is part and parcel of technological leadership.

State shares, like those held by tech founders, take a toll in terms of performance and free markets. An asymmetric veto on takeovers deprives other shareholders of the opportunity to sell; a particular handicap in the UK’s M&A-heavy market. Take the redemption of golden shares in water and electricity utilities in the mid-1990s. To the dismay of politicians, this unleashed a flurry of bids and within two years all but one of the 12 regional electricity companies had been flogged.

The European Commission, more concerned at the impediment to the free flow of capital, was largely successful in stamping them out although holdouts — especially in the UK — remain. These include BAE and Rolls-Royce, both of which operate defence capabilities.

There is a case to be made for government vetoes when it comes to national security. Golden shares also have a use elsewhere, such as fostering environmental or social missions. The Thomson family’s founders’ share in Thomson Reuters, designed to safeguard independence and lack of bias in reporting, also makes sense. Slapping similar government rights on to tech companies does not.

版權聲明:本文版權歸FT中文網所有,未經允許任何單位或個人不得轉載,複製或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵權必究。

全球經濟是否正跌入「慘淡的20年代」?

經濟成長在短期內會加快,但對未來十年經濟停滯的擔憂正在加劇,這將帶來慘淡的政治後果。

軍事簡報:以色列用於打擊伊朗的飛彈

在伊拉克拍攝到的殘骸顯示了以色列戰機是如何從遠處對德黑蘭進行還擊的。

市場主題瓦解考驗投資者神經

瑰麗七股已經不再炙手可熱,但這只是暫時的挫折嗎?

輝達股價下跌10%,投資者認爲大型科技股存在風險

隨著投資者撤出對人工智慧的押注,美國股市遭遇了自2022年10月以來最糟糕的表現。

英國的客戶服務怎麼會變得如此糟糕?

客戶服務的崩潰讓企業損失慘重,也讓我們失去理智。

內塔尼亞胡的伊朗賭局留有避免全面戰爭餘地

前官員和分析人士表示,襲擊並不會迫使德黑蘭做出回應,但他們擔心現在已經越過了底線。
設置字型大小×
最小
較小
默認
較大
最大
分享×