Golden shares: a tarnished solution that smacks of protectionism - FT中文網
登錄×
電子郵件/用戶名
密碼
記住我
請輸入郵箱和密碼進行綁定操作:
請輸入手機號碼,透過簡訊驗證(目前僅支援中國大陸地區的手機號):
請您閱讀我們的用戶註冊協議私隱權保護政策,點擊下方按鈕即視爲您接受。
FT商學院

Golden shares: a tarnished solution that smacks of protectionism

State shares take a toll in terms of performance and free markets

State-held shares are back on the agenda. Popular during Europe’s wave of privatisation in the 1970s and 80s, so called golden shares — spezialaktie in Germany — allowed governments to wield control over a slew of public companies including utilities and oil and gas majors. By far the bulk had been redeemed by the turn of the millennium.

With globalisation in retreat and protectionism firmly re-ensconced, British politicians are hoping to spark a revival. The defence committee wants them reinstated across defence companies, irked at US private equity owned Cobham’s $3.6bn bid for Ultra Electronics. More speciously, MP Tom Tugendhat is angling for a government share — and a 25.1 per cent stake — in Arm, the chip designer, which owner SoftBank plans to list in New York after its planned $40bn sale to Nvidia collapsed. Echoing Washington and Beijing, he argues that national security is part and parcel of technological leadership.

State shares, like those held by tech founders, take a toll in terms of performance and free markets. An asymmetric veto on takeovers deprives other shareholders of the opportunity to sell; a particular handicap in the UK’s M&A-heavy market. Take the redemption of golden shares in water and electricity utilities in the mid-1990s. To the dismay of politicians, this unleashed a flurry of bids and within two years all but one of the 12 regional electricity companies had been flogged.

The European Commission, more concerned at the impediment to the free flow of capital, was largely successful in stamping them out although holdouts — especially in the UK — remain. These include BAE and Rolls-Royce, both of which operate defence capabilities.

There is a case to be made for government vetoes when it comes to national security. Golden shares also have a use elsewhere, such as fostering environmental or social missions. The Thomson family’s founders’ share in Thomson Reuters, designed to safeguard independence and lack of bias in reporting, also makes sense. Slapping similar government rights on to tech companies does not.

版權聲明:本文版權歸FT中文網所有,未經允許任何單位或個人不得轉載,複製或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵權必究。

員工幸福感越高,公司估值越高?

研究發現,盈利能力更強、股市表現更好的公司,員工的幸福感、使命感和工作滿意度往往更高。

馮德萊恩支援將歐盟預算與經濟改革掛鉤

歐盟委員會主席尋求複製疫後復甦基金的「成功」。

輝達的競爭對手力圖打破其「Cuda」平臺的壟斷地位

OpenAI領頭推動「Cuda」替代方案的開發,力圖打破這家晶片製造商對人工智慧市場的壟斷。

制裁對伊朗直升機造成了怎樣的破壞

由於西方國家的制裁,伊朗一直無法更新其機隊,在此次墜機事件中的墜毀美製貝爾212已服役近30年。

生活成本危機下澳洲推出租金補貼和能源退稅

這場危機將澳洲劃分爲房主和租房者,中左翼工黨政府正試圖在明年大選前提振中低收入者的收入。

Lex專欄:《體育畫報》揭示的品牌貨幣化陷阱

也許收購能夠讓這些珍愛的品牌生存下去,但也可能讓它面目全非。
設置字型大小×
最小
較小
默認
較大
最大
分享×