Bitcoin lacks a solid foundation as an international currency | 比特幣缺乏作爲國際貨幣的基礎 - FT中文網
登錄×
電子郵件/用戶名
密碼
記住我
請輸入郵箱和密碼進行綁定操作:
請輸入手機號碼,透過簡訊驗證(目前僅支援中國大陸地區的手機號):
請您閱讀我們的用戶註冊協議私隱權保護政策,點擊下方按鈕即視爲您接受。
FT英語電臺

Bitcoin lacks a solid foundation as an international currency
比特幣缺乏作爲國際貨幣的基礎

For millennia, money has acted as a store of value as well as reducing transaction costs — crypto does neither
幾千年來,貨幣一直是一種價值儲存手段,同時也降低了交易成本——加密貨幣兩者都不具備。
00:00

The writer is associate professor at the Research Institute of Industrial Economics

The value of bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies has multiplied in the last decade. Non-existent returns on fixed-income securities and the fear of future inflation when central banks let the money printing press run at full tilt have led investors to seek alternatives. Many have invested in cryptocurrencies. There is also a superstition that they will take over as an international means of payment. El Salvador’s president recently said he would make bitcoin legal tender in the country.

Research has shown that an international currency must meet at least four basic conditions: it must have a long-term stable value; there must be sufficient volume to meet the needs of international trade in goods, services and financial assets; transaction costs must be low, with small differences between bid and ask prices, and high liquidity; and there must be a stable issuer who guarantees the currency.

Based on this, market participants choose which currency should be the most viable in world trade, and no supranational authority is needed. The conditions apply for both commodity and fiat money. For fiat, there must be an issuer, as the currency implies a commitment to the holder.

Historically, all dominating international currencies met the requirements: Athenian tetradrachms (c. 480-40BC), Roman denarii (211BC-AD200), Byzantine solidus (300-1085), florins and ducats from Florence and Venice (1250-1600), the Dutch guilder/ducat (1600-1780), British pounds (1800-1918) and finally US dollars (1918-present). Of these, the gold coin solidus was the longest-lived, its content and weight unchanged for more than 700 years, giving rise to the word solid.

Bitcoin, however, meets none of the four conditions. First, it has greater volatility than any other predominant currency in history. Price changes of tens of per cent within days are commonplace. Second, there is a pre-determined maximum amount that can be created. If it is to cover the needs of a growing international trade, the relative value of the currency must increase, which makes it even more unstable. Third, transaction costs are high; transactions take time and the system can only handle a limited number per time period. 

Furthermore, the blockchain system that produces bitcoin consumes enormous amounts of energy and there is no stable issuer that can guarantee the currency. If one or more large regimes were to ban transactions, the fairy tale could soon be over. And while the limited amount of each cryptocurrency restricts over-issuing, there are a huge number of them, with new ones created every day.

A medium that works well as money should reduce transaction costs but must also act as a store of value. Money can then act as a lubricant in the economy. Bitcoin cannot fulfil these functions either. Money has the character of a network product: the more people who accept it, the more worthwhile it becomes. Bitcoin is only accepted within a limited group.

The popularity of cryptocurrencies is partly due to the anonymity of holders of bitcoin wallets. Although transactions can be identified, it is difficult for third parties to identify who is behind them. This makes them popular with criminals and money launderers. Others see them as a possible investment. But there is nothing value-stable in a medium that does not meet any function as a mode of exchange, unit of account or store of value, and which lacks an issuer. The increase in value is reminiscent of a pyramid scheme where investors constantly hope that others will value the asset ever higher.

When bitcoin regains its true value, the awakening could be brutal for many. It is not only the cryptocurrency that has a limited volume, but also the number of people who are tempted to join pyramid schemes.

undefined

版權聲明:本文版權歸FT中文網所有,未經允許任何單位或個人不得轉載,複製或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵權必究。

從臺北到布達佩斯:尋呼機爆炸的神祕軌跡

黎巴嫩真主黨遭遇的大膽襲擊事件所涉設備的供應鏈跨越三大洲。

Lex專欄:無論如何衡量,私募股權基金的表現都很糟糕

投資者急於回籠資金,迫使私募股權基金不得不降低標價以售出資產。

歐盟新任競爭事務專員:必須「改進」合併規則

特雷莎•裏貝拉在接受FT採訪時表示,歐洲企業需要具備規模才能與全球對手競爭。

鋪設中國太陽能板的熱潮威脅巴基斯坦負債累累的電網

電價飆升促使巴基斯坦企業爭相在工廠屋頂鋪設超低價的中國太陽能板。

針對川普的明顯暗殺企圖:到目前爲止我們知道什麼?

嫌疑人被捕引發了人們對美國總統選舉最後階段候選人安全的擔憂。

技術能源正在重塑世界

擁有化石燃料儲備的傳統權力掮客將看到他們的全球影響力減弱。
設置字型大小×
最小
較小
默認
較大
最大
分享×