The cloud over cloud companies - FT中文網
登錄×
電子郵件/用戶名
密碼
記住我
請輸入郵箱和密碼進行綁定操作:
請輸入手機號碼,透過簡訊驗證(目前僅支援中國大陸地區的手機號):
請您閱讀我們的用戶註冊協議私隱權保護政策,點擊下方按鈕即視爲您接受。
FT商學院

The cloud over cloud companies

The sector has been left behind in the euphoria over artificial intelligence sweeping through the stock market

There is one notable corner of the tech world that has not been touched by the artificial intelligence euphoria sweeping through the stock market.

If generative AI really does represent the next great sales opportunity for the tech industry, then software companies ought to be among the biggest winners. After all, most AI is likely to show up as enhanced features in the business software that companies rely on in their daily operations.

However, the BVP Nasdaq index of cloud software companies is down nearly 10 per cent this year, while the Nasdaq Composite is up more than 20 per cent. It has also halved from its pandemic-era peak. The slump points to an industry at a crossroads. A long, secular growth phase driven by the rise of the cloud looks like it is entering a new and more mature state, while the next (the spread of generative AI in business) has barely begun.

At times like this, Wall Street faces complex questions. If the cloud business really is maturing, the focus of investors needs to shift more quickly from growth to value. Tech companies that recently reported disappointing results, such as Salesforce, MongoDB and Workday, have tried to pass the lull off as the result of extended economic weakness. But the longer it goes on, the harder this argument is to sustain. Salesforce’s revenues doubled in the past four years to $36bn: at that scale, the slower 10 per cent growth it has projected for next year begins to look more like the norm.

At the same time, investors have to handicap which companies will catch the next wave of growth and which will fail to adapt and be left in the dust.

According to the companies themselves, the lack of an impact on their sales from AI is just a timing issue. Salesforce chief executive Marc Benioff, for instance, points to the challenge of training large armies of salespeople to handle what he calls “a harder, more complex sell”. Customers are grappling with a wide set of questions, seeking to understand how the new AI models work and how their workers should interact with them. They also need to consider how to redesign their work processes to make best use of the technology, as well as deal with new threats to the security of their data.

Even if sales are still negligible, the software companies report huge interest from customers in piloting their new AI services. This may mean the AI dividend has just been delayed.

Yet the disruptive threats from AI suggest things will not be so straightforward. One is the upheaval to the cloud companies’ business model. Most rely on charging per-seat subscriptions, meaning their revenue goes up in line with the number of workers using their services. If generative AI works as promised and makes workers far more productive, customers should be able to do more with fewer staff.

The result has been a pivot towards consumption-based pricing, or charging based on how much the new services are actually used. Tying fees to usage has the added advantage of offsetting some of the higher cost of delivering generative AI. But unless this leads to real and demonstrable business benefits, the software companies could face a backlash when customers see their bills soar.

The software groups also have tech history to contend with. In the past, new tech eras — such as the rise of client-server computing in the 1990s and cloud computing the following decade — have brought new waves of start-up software companies to the fore. New companies, their products and business models designed from the ground up to fit a new computing paradigm start with a big advantage.

The first wave of these “AI native” software companies has often looked like little more than “wrappers” around the large language models, adding only a veneer of industry-specific expertise as they offer businesses ways to adopt generative AI. But they are all working hard to gain a foothold from where they can start to build out more compelling services.

According to Salesforce’s Benioff, the incumbents will be hard to unseat. Companies such as his have become the repositories of their customers’ most important data, he says, giving them a big advantage when it comes to training the AI models that businesses will find truly useful.

That will only count if today’s cloud companies can adapt their own products and processes to the new technology fast enough. For now, Wall Street is suspending judgment.

richard.waters@ft.com

版權聲明:本文版權歸FT中文網所有,未經允許任何單位或個人不得轉載,複製或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵權必究。

英國生物技術公司新藥降低量身定製式癌症療法副作用

Autolus用於治療急性淋巴細胞白血病的新型Car-T細胞療法在美國獲批,該療法與癌細胞結合所需時間更短,因此副作用更小。

前保守黨財政大臣告誡工黨現任勿看衰英國前景

傑里米•杭特表示,英國在關鍵成長領域表現強勁,應該停止貶低自己。

Lex專欄:遊戲機製造商在低迷市場中表現強勁

雖然遊戲機老化通常意味著遊戲公司收入持續下降,但多年未推出新產品的索尼和任天堂等遊戲公司仍表現強勁。

爲年度展望報告辯護

巴克蘭:定期回顧投資框架以及進行經濟和市場展望是一項良好的做法。

企業長壽的奧祕爲何對投資者很重要

長壽公司除了具有凝聚力、寬容度和財務保守等特徵外,幾乎沒有什麼共同點。
1天前

川普上臺能否解決加拿大經濟疲軟問題?

經濟學家表示,來自美國的衝擊可能會使該國經濟擺脫麻木狀態。
設置字型大小×
最小
較小
默認
較大
最大
分享×