Magicians and warlords in the world of tech | 科技界的魔術師和軍閥 - FT中文網
登錄×
電子郵件/用戶名
密碼
記住我
請輸入郵箱和密碼進行綁定操作:
請輸入手機號碼,透過簡訊驗證(目前僅支援中國大陸地區的手機號):
請您閱讀我們的用戶註冊協議私隱權保護政策,點擊下方按鈕即視爲您接受。
FT英語電臺

Magicians and warlords in the world of tech
科技界的魔術師和軍閥

The winning article in the 2021 FT/World Today student competition
2021年FT/今日世界學生競賽的獲獎文章。
00:00

This is the winner of the 2021 FT Schools/World Today competition asking ‘What makes a good leader?’ It was written by Thomas Cowan of Tiffin School, Kingston upon Thames in the UK

The German sociologist Max Weber proposed that the great leaders of the past could be split into two groups: the ‘magicians’ and the ‘warlords’. They established themselves through different methods. The magicians claimed that they were enlightened and used their individual charisma to create a community of loyal followers. The warlords were more direct, using aggression and military skill to overcome their competition, particularly where there was no pre-existing authority. These archetypes are not confined to history. Naturally, religious leaders are magicians. They are individuals who, through the power of their words and the beliefs they represent, gain the devotion of billions. But in the western world, religion is on the decline. People, especially the young, are increasingly less dependent on organised faith for their morals and world view. Instead, they look to inspiring leaders in a range of industries, and these idols are the new magicians. Steve Jobs is a prime example of a magician. He wasn’t an engineer or a programmer; at Apple, that was Steve Wozniak. But the reason that Wozniak was only ever ‘the other Steve’ was that Apple, the company, was itself more important than its products, and Steve Jobs was Apple. He became world-renowned because of his exciting rhetoric and compelling self-presentation.

In the memorial on Apple’s website, people across the world describe the man as a visionary, a genius and a hero. They recount how Jobs changed their lives and lament the loss of an ‘irreplaceable’ leader. Within Apple, however, some saw him as a bully. Jobs never refuted this, stating that his job was ‘not to be easy on people’. Bully or not, his demand for ingenuity was the key factor in Apple’s groundbreaking innovation; something that seems to have waned after Jobs’ passing. Conversely, Mark Zuckerberg could be typified as a warlord. The Facebook CEO’s ascendancy to international influence started with his coding abilities, and his company has since maintained its early dominance over the burgeoning social media market with the strategic purchases of Instagram and Snapchat.

Zuckerberg’s Senate appearance to defend his platform’s content moderation demonstrates how he has led Facebook to a place where it grants him unprecedented sway over public opinion and politics. Moral or not, Zuckerberg’s rise has been meteoric. Jobs and Zuckerberg are undeniably ‘good’ leaders, their massively valuable companies each becoming entrenched in popular culture. But on the battlefield of iconic figureheads, Jobs wins out. Whilst Zuckerberg is undeniably intelligent, he lacks a degree of charisma and personality. His public perception is neutral at best.

Jobs was, and remains, an inspiration to many; each of his product launches gave the impression of a glimpse into his crystal ball. Jobs will live on because he had the most precious leadership ability of all: the ability to inspire. The warlord does not need charisma; the magician deals in it. In the wake of Covid-19 and the resulting economic turmoil, we might see people turning to magicians more than ever.

版權聲明:本文版權歸FT中文網所有,未經允許任何單位或個人不得轉載,複製或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵權必究。

亞馬遜再次向人工智慧新創公司Anthropic注資40億美元

隨著生成人工智慧競賽的加劇,這家科技集團的總投資翻了一番,達到80億美元。

川普任命貝森特爲財政部長

對沖基金經理將負責落實當選總統減稅和提高關稅的承諾。

川普與股市的蜜月期能持續多久?

股票投資者似乎並不擔心關稅和減稅將推高通膨和赤字的風險。但恐懼正在加劇。

「鬆了一口氣」:華爾街歡迎川普選擇貝森特擔任財政部長

在對美國最高經濟職位的激烈爭奪之後,對沖基金投資者獲得提名。

爲什麼投資者認爲美國股市無可替代

基金經理們發現,要把資金投入到其他地方,真的很難找到有力的理由。

Thrive Capital:多樣化是給那些不知道自己在做什麼的人準備的

喬什•庫許納旗下的這家年輕的創投公司以大手筆投資OpenAI而聞名,顛覆了傳統的風險投資模式。它能得到真正的收益嗎?
設置字型大小×
最小
較小
默認
較大
最大
分享×