00:00
尊敬的用戶您好,這是來自FT中文網的溫馨提示:如您對更多FT中文網的內容感興趣,請在蘋果應用商店或谷歌應用市場搜尋「FT中文網」,下載FT中文網的官方應用。
{"text":[[{"start":null,"text":"
"}],[{"start":8.5,"text":"How did the word “capitalism” arise? "},{"start":10.929,"text":"If you ask most investors that question today, they might mutter about markets, commerce and Adam Smith — or Karl Marx. "},{"start":17.847,"text":"But according to Michael Sonenscher, a British historian, the term actually emerged first in 18th-century Europe in connection with war finance. "}],[{"start":26.48,"text":"“‘Capitalism’ began as a French word (capitalisme) but was used initially to refer to several largely British problems,” Sonenscher notes. "},{"start":34.509,"text":"“The most salient was the [18th-century] system of war finance. "},{"start":38.702,"text":"In French, someone who lent money to a branch of the French royal government was called a capitalist (capitaliste). ”"}],[{"start":45.71,"text":"On one level, this is just an amusing quirk of history. "},{"start":49.302,"text":"But it should also prompt serious reflection today. "},{"start":52.119,"text":"In the decades after the cold war, the “peace dividend” was such that modern financiers — and voters — rarely pondered the question of how wars are paid for. "},{"start":60.562,"text":"This week, however, the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute reported that rising geopolitical conflict sparked a 7 per cent, inflation-adjusted, rise in defence spending last year, to a record $2.4tn, or 2.3 per cent of global economic output. "}],[{"start":77.52,"text":"That partly reflects the impact of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. "},{"start":81.34899999999999,"text":"Not only has American, European and Ukrainian expenditure jumped, but Russian military outlays have risen above 6 per cent of gross domestic product. "}],[{"start":90.46,"text":"In fact, spending rose last year in all five geopolitical regions tracked by Sipri, for the first time. "},{"start":96.97699999999999,"text":"“States are prioritising military strength but they risk an action-reaction spiral in the increasingly volatile geopolitical and security landscape,” says Sipri researcher Nan Tian. "}],[{"start":107.58,"text":"Rishi Sunak, UK prime minister, this week put Britain’s defence industry on a “war footing”, with expenditure scheduled to rise to 2.5 per cent of GDP by 2030, and Nato recently announced a $100bn spending plan. "},{"start":121.28399999999999,"text":"Then there are the $95bn worth of military aid bills for Ukraine, Taiwan and Israel that were just approved by the US Congress. "},{"start":128.964,"text":"The “action-reaction” spiral is under way. "}],[{"start":132.43,"text":"Thankfully, this rate of increase is still lower than at various points in the 20th century — and it comes from a low base. "},{"start":139.059,"text":"Sixty years ago, before the peace dividend kicked in, the US and UK respectively spent 8 and 6 per cent of GDP on the military. "},{"start":147.014,"text":"But given that most modern investors built their careers when “capitalism” was defined in peaceful terms, there are at least three points they should note. "}],[{"start":155.14000000000001,"text":"First, history shows that governments almost never tell voters the true cost of war, or how they intend to pay for it. "},{"start":161.85700000000003,"text":"Exceptions exist. "},{"start":163.34900000000002,"text":"In 1940, for example, John Maynard Keynes published a clear-headed pamphlet entitled How to Pay for the War. "},{"start":169.77900000000002,"text":"And last year Denmark cancelled a national holiday to create additional revenue for defence outlays. "},{"start":175.04700000000003,"text":"In the US, political consultants are supposed to scrutinise congressional spending bills. "},{"start":180.03900000000002,"text":"But transparency is rare. "},{"start":181.96900000000002,"text":"As Sonenscher notes, the key reason why 18th-century European kings issued debt to pay for military adventures was to circumvent the scrutiny of legislatures. "}],[{"start":191.58,"text":"And while the recent furore around the Ukraine bill in Congress creates a veneer of democratic oversight, “public access to budget information about . . . post-9/11 [military spending] is imperfect and incomplete”, according to a critical report from Brown University’s Watson Institute. "}],[{"start":207.12,"text":"The second lesson is that, even if costs are eventually wiped out via tax increases, inflation or plunder, there is usually a surge in debt. "},{"start":215.299,"text":"The Watson Institute estimates that in the US there has been $8tn in military outlay since 2001, which was “paid for almost entirely by borrowing”. "},{"start":223.892,"text":"Absent early repayment via massive tax rises, miraculous growth and